Donate
Diocese of Leeds Justice and Peace Commission (1)

10 June – Reclaiming Histories: Slavery, Race and the Churches

Report on the day by Kathy Shaw, SPARK Manager

Reclaiming Histories: Slavery, Race and the Churches

Jointly funded by the Centre for Religion and Public Life at the University of Leeds, Leeds Church Institute and United Society Partners in the Gospel

Aims:

The event aimed to promote deeper learning and discussion about racism within churches, considering the impact of the transatlantic slave trade and the contemporary context of the Black Lives Matter movement.

slavery__race_and_the_churches History and Legacy

The documentary film “After the Flood” shown at the start of the day explored the history of slavery specifically focussed on the transatlantic slave trade, the neglect of slavery in British Christian history and the lasting impact on attitudes about race today. The film explored biblical justifications used to support slavery and the concept of whiteness, looking at how this influenced racism and the need for reconciliation today. Some interesting historical facts emerged, such as how the laws in Barbados replaced Christian to white which became a legal status to justify the enslavement of Africans and their descendants. Missionary work was politically desirable, and slavery was seen to be sanctioned and justified by the Bible. Being pro slavery was a natural part of society, but people wanted it to be more acceptable. Reformers initially wanted a more Christian version of slavery, not to seek their freedom but to make slaves more compliant, a system that required reforming not abolishing.

Screenshot 2025-06-10 152355 The missionary arm of the Church of England, the Society for the Propagation of the Christian Religion in Foreign Parts (SPG), inherited three sugar estates in the Caribbean. The plantation was run for the Church by professional planters, but its profits went to the missionary group. Slaves working on the estate were branded on their chests with the word "society". In the 18th Century, Britain was responsible for over 2.5 million of the 6 million slaves transported. Of these slaves that British slave traders bought or sold, around 300,000 did not survive the journey across the Atlantic.

The Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 outlawed slavery within the British Empire, emancipating over 800,000 enslaved Africans. However, this abolition was achieved through a compromise: the British government agreed to compensate slave owners for the loss of their "property” (enslaved people). In 1834 a sum of £20 million (approximately £1,958 million in 2022 prices) was allocated for this purpose, and payments were made to slave owners.

This still did not bring freedom but a brutal system of ownership where slaves became low waged apprentices, legally free but having to work two thirds of the week for their former slave owner. If they left the plantation they could be imprisoned.

SAact_main A legacy of unjust systems and disadvantage continues; institutional racism, lack of representation and inclusion. This was a continuing theme in small group discussions and a well informed plenary panel and asking the question of how a black Christian makes sense of the white narrative which was used to justify slavery. An uncomfortable truth emerges when the history of Christian slavery is explored in terms of unlearning racism to identify who still has the power and continues to benefit.

In a debate in 2006, the General Synod of the Church of England voted to issue an apology for their role in sustaining the slave trade. An apology is part of the process of reconciliation but many British and European firms and their predecessors "drank from the well of Caribbean slavery", said historian Prof. Sir Hilary Beckles who is vice-chancellor of the University of the West Indies. In 2020 he called on British firms to fund development projects in the Caribbean.

"Unfortunately, one cannot go back and remake the history but you can make atonement: it is not enough to make your apology as a public spectacle, it is not enough to present it as public relations exercise,"

This film is available through the Movement for Justice and Reconciliation who funded the production, more details here https://www.mjr-uk.com/

p0jpmm6h I felt this film was a starting point for reflection and conversations about unlearning racism within a Church or youth setting, but was a narrative led by white voices. There was a lack of black scholars, academics and activists to lead on these debates and perhaps a missed opportunity to focus on how and when we start to dismantle this legacy. I was left feeling, “and now what?”

Leeds Church Institute

The afternoon started with Dwayne Hutchinson from LCI introducing the work of Churches Against Racism, a positive, uplifting and well-informed input. Black clergy shared their theological and personal experiences. Black academics presented how faith and race informed their framework of reference. These presentations and contributions from those around the room had a deep and lasting impact. To listen to lived experiences and the pain that is carried through the generations lifted this conference out of the ordinary and into a challenge to think and act differently. It gave SPARK a profile with a largely new group of people and some useful personal contacts were made and will be followed up.

There are a number of resources from LCI and UPSG and if you want to discuss anything from this paper just let me know.

 

Can the State/Church have a prophetic voice if it is part of the establishment?

 

To explore the duality of the secular impact on Christianity a book by Walter Brueggeman “The Prophetic Imagination” was recommended by some attendees.

71lTwjrERGL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_ And Finally!

There were a number of facts I knew intellectually but still resonate with me after the event...

- Indigenous and native people never see themselves as being “discovered” or ask to be offered the truth of Christianity

- Slave owners had the power to order the world and through this lens all the natural resources were harnessed to be productive, but only a select portion of humanity benefitted

- Being a Christian, of any denomination didn’t automatically lead to being an abolitionist or change the material aspects of slave ownership for many generations. Rather, the Bible was used to dehumanise and justify the trade and profits.

Care Workers – Modern Day Slavery in the UK

by Sara Forrest

Modern-day Slaves are significantly exploited by their employers. A high proportion are sex workers. Women are therefore more likely to be slaves than men. Charities working in this sector estimate that there are about 122,000 people currently living in the UK who are Modern-day Slaves.

The Government established a Care Workers Visa to enable workers from abroad to pay for visas to come here to work in what are often minimum wage jobs. Sadly, some employment agencies saw this as an opportunity to make lots of money and advertised Care Work jobs in the UK. Those applying did not realise that there could be times when no work would be available.

UK care sector a hotbed of modern slavery as victim numbers soar
Visa holders cannot claim unemployment benefits or work for other employers. This gives their employers greater power. Significant numbers of these new Care Workers started to call the Modern-day Slavery Advice Lines due to the exploitation they suffered; forced to work long hours, pay for training/accommodation/uniform and to work anywhere.

The Visa rules have been changed each year to reduce the factors contributing to this exploitation. But the exploitation continues.

I know of one family where the mother got a Care Worker Visa, her husband and children got Dependent Visas. The family came expecting to be more financially secure than they had been in Africa. With both parents working full-time for the minimum wage the family could just about provide for themselves.

Forced to work 20 hours a day six days a week
But the mother’s full-time care work soon stopped. Her agency could then provide her with only part-time work. Her sponsor offered her a temporary, full-time job 200 miles away. She had to take it to feed her family. When that job ended they offered part-time work in the same city. The family were desperate.

Her family will not be more secure until she finds a local employer who has a job in their own Care Home and who will pay to sponsor her. It is very difficult to find such jobs. Life in the UK is not what the family imagined. Their livelihood as insecure as it was in Africa.

Care worker
In Hope, the Pope says

‘Every Christian is called upon to be an instrument of God for the liberation of all people and the advancement of the poor. This implies more than a few sporadic acts of generosity. It presumes a new mindset that thinks in terms of community.’

UK Slavery still happens. We know that as a country we do not have enough income to pay for all the services we expect. Poverty is a political choice. The Government are responsible for allocating their income for the good of all. Parties accept that the Care Sector is not working effectively.

Maybe in response to the Pope’s plea for a new mindset we should each think about (and talk about) what we consider to be fair share of the costs of our own care?

We must not be distracted by arguments about promises of no tax rises. There must be radical changes if the Care Sector is to become sustainable without the risk of Modern-day Slavery.

For more information:

ACAS have a good website that explains employee rights.

 

The Modern-day Slavery helplines are:

Unseen 0800 012 1700

Salvation Army 0800 808 3733